You are counting questions, not repairing patterns
A higher question count can hide the real problem. If the same type of miss repeats across domains, the issue is not effort. It is an unrepaired rule, definition, or scenario-reading habit.
If your practice score has stopped moving, the solution is usually not more random questions. It is a tighter feedback loop between missed items, concepts, distractors, and the next practice set.
Treat practice scores as feedback, not a verdict. A score plateau can be useful if it points you toward the exact discrimination that still needs repair.
More prep guidesA higher question count can hide the real problem. If the same type of miss repeats across domains, the issue is not effort. It is an unrepaired rule, definition, or scenario-reading habit.
Many BCBA candidates understand the correct answer after reading it. The harder skill is explaining why the answer they chose was weaker. That comparison is where scenario judgment improves.
Mock scores are useful signals, but they are too blunt to be the whole plan. Two candidates can get the same score for different reasons: pacing, ethics decisions, measurement terms, treatment integrity, or concept discrimination.
Changing materials can feel productive, but it often resets the review process. Before switching, ask whether you have extracted the domain, concept, clue, distractor, and next drill from the questions you already missed.
A stalled practice score usually means review is not specific enough. Track the domain, concept, distractor pattern, and scenario clue behind each missed item instead of only recording right or wrong.
Not immediately. Use one mock to locate weak patterns, then repair those patterns with targeted practice before taking another timed set.
Stop random practice and isolate that concept. Review the rule, write why the distractor was attractive, then answer several similar scenarios.