Question
Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: concept discrimination.
Student responds differently when the antecedent, consequence, or learning history changes. Which concept from matching law and response allocation is most relevant? The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.
AContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
BAdd a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
CUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
DCompare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to student's calling out during independent workCorrect answer
Explanation
Answer DThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Matching law and response allocation. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting. Compare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to student's calling out during independent work is best because it answers that clue through schedules, persistence, and response allocation instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Matching law and response allocation. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
NextIf you missed it, review Schedules, persistence, and response allocationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
BChoice BA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
CChoice CA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
Study tags
Schedules, persistence, and response allocationMatching law and response allocationschedulesbehavioral momentum
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.