Question

Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: concept discrimination.

During a community outing, the team explains adolescent's grabbing preferred items with a personality label. The BCBA wants the discussion to reflect radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. What is the best next step? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.

A
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
B
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
C
Use the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items

Correct answer

D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer C

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings. Use the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through private events in radical behaviorism instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Private events in radical behaviorism

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

B
Choice B

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Private events in radical behaviorismRadical behaviorist explanation of behaviorprivate eventsfeelings

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations. It also includes study tags for Private events in radical behaviorism, Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior, private events, feelings.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.