Question
Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: concept discrimination.
During a community outing, the team explains adolescent's grabbing preferred items with a personality label. The BCBA wants the discussion to reflect radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. What is the best next step? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.
ASend the written protocol again without observing performance
BProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
CUse the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred itemsCorrect answer
DTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings. Use the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through private events in radical behaviorism instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
NextIf you missed it, review Private events in radical behaviorismThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
BChoice BGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
DChoice DVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
Study tags
Private events in radical behaviorismRadical behaviorist explanation of behaviorprivate eventsfeelings
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.