Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
During a home program, the team explains child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented with a personality label. The BCBA wants the discussion to reflect radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. What is the best next step? The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
ARely on parent's report alone and stop collecting direct evidence
BChange the intervention immediately based on the concern alone
CUse the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presentedCorrect answer
DContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting. Use the report as contextual information while still assessing observable behavior-environment relations in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented is best because it answers that clue through private events in radical behaviorism instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Radical behaviorist explanation of behavior. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
NextIf you missed it, review Private events in radical behaviorismThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
BChoice BThis is weaker because it skips the assessment, integrity, or decision rule needed before changing procedures.
DChoice DIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
Study tags
Private events in radical behaviorismRadical behaviorist explanation of behaviorprivate eventsfeelings
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.