Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: applied scenario.
Learner is learning requesting help, but performance changes depending on prompts and consequences. Which procedure best fits stimulus and response generalization procedures? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 2 settings.
AProgram multiple examples, natural cues, and follow-up probes so behavior persists beyond training in relation to learner's requesting helpCorrect answer
BSend the written protocol again without observing performance
CProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
DTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 2 settings. Program multiple examples, natural cues, and follow-up probes so behavior persists beyond training in relation to learner's requesting help is best because it answers that clue through generalization and maintenance programming instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
NextIf you missed it, review Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
CChoice CGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
DChoice DVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
Study tags
Generalization and maintenance programmingStimulus and response generalization proceduresgeneralizationmaintenance
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.