Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: applied scenario.
Adolescent is learning waiting for access, but performance changes depending on prompts and consequences. Which procedure best fits stimulus and response generalization procedures? The case file includes 8 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
AProgram multiple examples, natural cues, and follow-up probes so behavior persists beyond training in relation to adolescent's waiting for accessCorrect answer
BUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
CSend the written protocol again without observing performance
DProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization procedures. The case file includes 8 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings. Program multiple examples, natural cues, and follow-up probes so behavior persists beyond training in relation to adolescent's waiting for access is best because it answers that clue through generalization and maintenance programming instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization procedures. The case file includes 8 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
NextIf you missed it, review Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
CChoice CWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
DChoice DGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
Study tags
Generalization and maintenance programmingStimulus and response generalization proceduresgeneralizationmaintenance
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.