Question

Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: applied scenario.

A program for following a visual schedule is not producing independent performance. Which adjustment best reflects conditioned reinforcer procedures? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.

A
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
B
Distinguish unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences by learning history and functional effect in relation to student's following a visual schedule

Correct answer

C
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer B

The clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Conditioned reinforcer procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings. Distinguish unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences by learning history and functional effect in relation to student's following a visual schedule is best because it answers that clue through unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Conditioned reinforcer procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

C
Choice C

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequencesConditioned reinforcer proceduresunconditioned reinforcerconditioned reinforcer

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Behavior-Change Procedures. It also includes study tags for Unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences, Conditioned reinforcer procedures, unconditioned reinforcer, conditioned reinforcer.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.