Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: applied scenario.
A program for following a visual schedule is not producing independent performance. Which adjustment best reflects conditioned reinforcer procedures? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
ASend the written protocol again without observing performance
BDistinguish unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences by learning history and functional effect in relation to student's following a visual scheduleCorrect answer
CProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
DTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
Explanation
Answer BThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Conditioned reinforcer procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings. Distinguish unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences by learning history and functional effect in relation to student's following a visual schedule is best because it answers that clue through unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequences instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Conditioned reinforcer procedures. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
NextIf you missed it, review Unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequencesThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
CChoice CGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
DChoice DVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
Study tags
Unconditioned, conditioned, and generalized consequencesConditioned reinforcer proceduresunconditioned reinforcerconditioned reinforcer
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.