Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: applied scenario.
Child is learning asking for a break, but performance changes depending on prompts and consequences. Which procedure best fits motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change? The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
AProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
BTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
CIdentify whether the antecedent changes reinforcer value or signals reinforcement availability before labeling the relation in relation to child's asking for a breakCorrect answer
DTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings. Identify whether the antecedent changes reinforcer value or signals reinforcement availability before labeling the relation in relation to child's asking for a break is best because it answers that clue through motivating operations versus discriminative stimuli instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
NextIf you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
BChoice BVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
DChoice DA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
Study tags
Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliMotivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior changeMOEO
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.