Question

Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: applied scenario.

Learner is learning requesting help, but performance changes depending on prompts and consequences. Which procedure best fits motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.

A
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
B
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
C
Identify whether the antecedent changes reinforcer value or signals reinforcement availability before labeling the relation in relation to learner's requesting help

Correct answer

D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer C

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings. Identify whether the antecedent changes reinforcer value or signals reinforcement availability before labeling the relation in relation to learner's requesting help is best because it answers that clue through motivating operations versus discriminative stimuli instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuli

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

B
Choice B

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliMotivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior changeMOEO

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Behavior-Change Procedures. It also includes study tags for Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuli, Motivating operations and discriminative stimuli in behavior change, MO, EO.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.