Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: applied scenario.
A program for following a visual schedule is not producing independent performance. Which adjustment best reflects simple and conditional discrimination procedures? The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.
AProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
BTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
CTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
DArrange teaching trials so the relevant antecedent controls the response and errors can be corrected in relation to student's following a visual scheduleCorrect answer
Explanation
Answer DThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Simple and conditional discrimination procedures. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings. Arrange teaching trials so the relevant antecedent controls the response and errors can be corrected in relation to student's following a visual schedule is best because it answers that clue through discrimination and stimulus-control teaching procedures instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Simple and conditional discrimination procedures. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
NextIf you missed it, review Discrimination and stimulus-control teaching proceduresThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
BChoice BVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
CChoice CA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
Study tags
Discrimination and stimulus-control teaching proceduresSimple and conditional discrimination proceduressimple discriminationconditional discrimination
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.