Question

Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: applied scenario.

A program for following a visual schedule is not producing independent performance. Which adjustment best reflects simple and conditional discrimination procedures? The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.

A
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
B
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
C
Treat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
D
Arrange teaching trials so the relevant antecedent controls the response and errors can be corrected in relation to student's following a visual schedule

Correct answer

Explanation

Answer D

The clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Simple and conditional discrimination procedures. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings. Arrange teaching trials so the relevant antecedent controls the response and errors can be corrected in relation to student's following a visual schedule is best because it answers that clue through discrimination and stimulus-control teaching procedures instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Simple and conditional discrimination procedures. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.

Trap
Common trap

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

Next
If you missed it, review Discrimination and stimulus-control teaching procedures

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

B
Choice B

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

C
Choice C

A single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.

Study tags

Discrimination and stimulus-control teaching proceduresSimple and conditional discrimination proceduressimple discriminationconditional discrimination

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Behavior-Change Procedures. It also includes study tags for Discrimination and stimulus-control teaching procedures, Simple and conditional discrimination procedures, simple discrimination, conditional discrimination.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.