Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: experimental design critique.
A BCBA is evaluating whether an intervention changed dropping to the floor when demands are presented. A second program change began during the same week. Which concern best reflects comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales? The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 3 settings.
ASelect the single-case design that can demonstrate control without creating impractical or unsafe conditions in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presentedCorrect answer
BTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
CTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
DBase the decision on the descriptive label for dropping to the floor when demands are presented and bypass comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 3 settings. Select the single-case design that can demonstrate control without creating impractical or unsafe conditions in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented is best because it answers that clue through single-case design selection instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 3 settings.
TrapCommon trapVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
NextIf you missed it, review Single-case design selectionThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
CChoice CA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
DChoice DThis is weaker because the label does not answer the Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales decision point or test Single-case design selection.
Study tags
Single-case design selectionComparative, component, and parametric analysis rationalesreversal designmultiple baseline
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Experimental Design and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.