Priorityhigh
Target in 500-item bank22
Target in 1000-item bank45

Concept review facts

Use this block to decide whether the concept needs definition review, scenario practice, or missed-question repair.

Fact
What this concept means here

Select a design based on reversibility, safety, behavior-change trajectory, and the need for replication.

Fact
How it appears in questions

Use multiple baseline when reversal is unsafe or impractical.

Fact
Best next action

If this concept is weak, practice Experimental Design scenarios and write one correction rule after each miss.

How this shows up in scenario questions

  1. 1Use multiple baseline when reversal is unsafe or impractical.
  2. 2Use changing criterion for gradual performance goals.
  3. 3Use alternating treatments for rapid treatment comparison.

Common misconceptions

  • Using reversal for irreversible skills.
  • Calling an AB design strong experimental control.
  • Choosing design based only on graph appearance.

Distractor patterns

  • AB design with no replication.
  • Reversal that withdraws a safety skill.
  • Scatterplot as experimental design.

Self-check before more practice

1
Can you define it without using the term itself?

If not, pause and rewrite the definition in plain language before answering more scenarios.

2
Can you spot the clue in a scenario stem?

Look for the data, timing, function, stakeholder, or ethical constraint that makes this concept relevant.

3
Can you reject the closest distractor?

A concept is not stable until you can explain why a plausible wrong answer is weaker.

Related terms

reversal designmultiple baselinechanging criterionalternating treatments

Turn this concept into practice

Use this page as a weak-area checkpoint: practice related scenarios, then review missed answers and save a study plan from your results.

Related study guides

Related practice prompts

Practice more

More concepts in this domain

Editorial transparency

Machine quality gate

Published by Bifang Studio. Content is maintained by internal editors with automated structure, coverage, and consistency checks. No content has been externally reviewed by a named, credential-verifiable BCBA; these checks do not certify clinical quality or exam validity.