Question

Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: experimental design critique.

A BCBA is evaluating whether an intervention changed grabbing preferred items. A second program change began during the same week. Which concern best reflects comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales? The case file includes 5 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

A
Select the single-case design that can demonstrate control without creating impractical or unsafe conditions in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items

Correct answer

B
Change the intervention immediately based on the concern alone
C
Continue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
D
Add a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility

Explanation

Answer A

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales. The case file includes 5 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting. Select the single-case design that can demonstrate control without creating impractical or unsafe conditions in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through single-case design selection instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales. The case file includes 5 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

This is weaker because it skips the assessment, integrity, or decision rule needed before changing procedures.

Next
If you missed it, review Single-case design selection

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

B
Choice B

This is weaker because it skips the assessment, integrity, or decision rule needed before changing procedures.

C
Choice C

Ignoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.

D
Choice D

A punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.

Study tags

Single-case design selectionComparative, component, and parametric analysis rationalesreversal designmultiple baseline

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Experimental Design and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Experimental Design. It also includes study tags for Single-case design selection, Comparative, component, and parametric analysis rationales, reversal design, multiple baseline.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.