Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
In a community outing, adolescent's grabbing preferred items changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches positive and negative reinforcement contingencies? The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 3 settings.
AClassify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred itemsCorrect answer
BRely on care team's report alone and stop collecting direct evidence
CChange the intervention immediately based on the concern alone
DContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Positive and negative reinforcement contingencies. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 3 settings. Classify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through reinforcement and punishment by behavior change instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Positive and negative reinforcement contingencies. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 3 settings.
TrapCommon trapStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
NextIf you missed it, review Reinforcement and punishment by behavior changeThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
CChoice CThis is weaker because it skips the assessment, integrity, or decision rule needed before changing procedures.
DChoice DIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
Study tags
Reinforcement and punishment by behavior changePositive and negative reinforcement contingenciespositive reinforcementnegative reinforcement
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.