Question

Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: concept discrimination.

In a home program, child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches positive and negative reinforcement contingencies? The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.

A
Classify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented

Correct answer

B
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
C
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
D
Treat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion

Explanation

Answer A

The clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Positive and negative reinforcement contingencies. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting. Classify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented is best because it answers that clue through reinforcement and punishment by behavior change instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Positive and negative reinforcement contingencies. The case file includes 10 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

Next
If you missed it, review Reinforcement and punishment by behavior change

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

B
Choice B

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

C
Choice C

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

D
Choice D

A single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.

Study tags

Reinforcement and punishment by behavior changePositive and negative reinforcement contingenciespositive reinforcementnegative reinforcement

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Concepts and Principles. It also includes study tags for Reinforcement and punishment by behavior change, Positive and negative reinforcement contingencies, positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.