Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
In a home program, child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches stimulus control examples? The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
AAnalyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presentedCorrect answer
BContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
CAdd a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
DUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Stimulus control examples. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting. Analyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented is best because it answers that clue through stimulus control, discrimination, and generalization instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Stimulus control examples. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
NextIf you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
CChoice CA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
DChoice DA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
Study tags
Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationStimulus control examplesstimulus controldiscrimination
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.