Question

Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: concept discrimination.

In a clinic session, learner's leaving the instructional area changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches stimulus and response generalization? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.

A
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
B
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
C
Analyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area

Correct answer

D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer C

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting. Analyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area is best because it answers that clue through stimulus control, discrimination, and generalization instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuli

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

B
Choice B

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationStimulus and response generalizationstimulus controldiscrimination

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Concepts and Principles. It also includes study tags for Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalization, Stimulus and response generalization, stimulus control, discrimination.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.