Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: concept discrimination.
In a clinic session, learner's leaving the instructional area changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches stimulus and response generalization? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.
ASend the written protocol again without observing performance
BProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
CAnalyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to learner's leaving the instructional areaCorrect answer
DTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting. Analyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area is best because it answers that clue through stimulus control, discrimination, and generalization instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Stimulus and response generalization. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
NextIf you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
BChoice BGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
DChoice DVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
Study tags
Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationStimulus and response generalizationstimulus controldiscrimination
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.