Priorityhigh
Target in 500-item bank10
Target in 1000-item bank20

Concept review facts

Use this block to decide whether the concept needs definition review, scenario practice, or missed-question repair.

Fact
What this concept means here

Distinguish rule-governed from contingency-shaped behavior and identify imitation or observational learning when behavior changes after models or described contingencies.

Fact
How it appears in questions

Identify behavior controlled by stated rules.

Fact
Best next action

If this concept is weak, practice Concepts and Principles scenarios and write one correction rule after each miss.

How this shows up in scenario questions

  1. 1Identify behavior controlled by stated rules.
  2. 2Distinguish direct contingency shaping from instruction following.
  3. 3Recognize imitation or observational learning in teaching examples.

Common misconceptions

  • Assuming all instruction-following is contingency-shaped.
  • Calling any similar behavior imitation without a model relation.
  • Ignoring whether contact with consequences occurred.

Distractor patterns

  • Choose reinforcement history when the stem emphasizes a rule.
  • Choose imitation when no modeled response is present.
  • Ignore delayed or described contingencies.

Self-check before more practice

1
Can you define it without using the term itself?

If not, pause and rewrite the definition in plain language before answering more scenarios.

2
Can you spot the clue in a scenario stem?

Look for the data, timing, function, stakeholder, or ethical constraint that makes this concept relevant.

3
Can you reject the closest distractor?

A concept is not stable until you can explain why a plausible wrong answer is weaker.

Related terms

rule-governed behaviorcontingency-shaped behaviorimitationobservational learning

Turn this concept into practice

Use this page as a weak-area checkpoint: practice related scenarios, then review missed answers and save a study plan from your results.

Related study guides

Related practice prompts

Practice more

More concepts in this domain

Editorial transparency

Machine quality gate

Published by Bifang Studio. Content is maintained by internal editors with automated structure, coverage, and consistency checks. No content has been externally reviewed by a named, credential-verifiable BCBA; these checks do not certify clinical quality or exam validity.