Priorityhigh
Target in 500-item bank21
Target in 1000-item bank43

Concept review facts

Use this block to decide whether the concept needs definition review, scenario practice, or missed-question repair.

Fact
What this concept means here

Plan interventions to reduce unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishment and to mitigate relapse of target behavior.

Fact
How it appears in questions

Identify relapse risk after intervention changes.

Fact
Best next action

If this concept is weak, practice Selecting and Implementing Interventions scenarios and write one correction rule after each miss.

How this shows up in scenario questions

  1. 1Identify relapse risk after intervention changes.
  2. 2Choose mitigation for extinction or punishment side effects.
  3. 3Plan follow-up when behavior returns.

Common misconceptions

  • Assuming reduced behavior can never return.
  • Ignoring emotional or elicited effects.
  • Using punishment without safeguards.

Distractor patterns

  • Declare treatment failure without analyzing context.
  • Ignore renewal across settings.
  • Escalate intrusiveness before mitigation.

Self-check before more practice

1
Can you define it without using the term itself?

If not, pause and rewrite the definition in plain language before answering more scenarios.

2
Can you spot the clue in a scenario stem?

Look for the data, timing, function, stakeholder, or ethical constraint that makes this concept relevant.

3
Can you reject the closest distractor?

A concept is not stable until you can explain why a plausible wrong answer is weaker.

Related terms

relapseresurgencerenewalside effectsmitigation

Turn this concept into practice

Use this page as a weak-area checkpoint: practice related scenarios, then review missed answers and save a study plan from your results.

Related study guides

Related practice prompts

Practice more

More concepts in this domain

Editorial transparency

Machine quality gate

Published by Bifang Studio. Content is maintained by internal editors with automated structure, coverage, and consistency checks. No content has been externally reviewed by a named, credential-verifiable BCBA; these checks do not certify clinical quality or exam validity.