Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: applied scenario.
A plan for following a visual schedule works in sessions but is difficult for teacher to use. Which decision best fits mitigating relapse of target behavior? The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings.
AContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
BPlan for relapse or side effects by monitoring context, thinning carefully, and adding safeguards in relation to student's calling out during independent workCorrect answer
CAdd a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
DUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
Explanation
Answer BThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Mitigating relapse of target behavior. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings. Plan for relapse or side effects by monitoring context, thinning carefully, and adding safeguards in relation to student's calling out during independent work is best because it answers that clue through relapse and side-effect mitigation instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of frequency data that vary from 3 to 11 responses per session, calling out during independent work, and the required task: Mitigating relapse of target behavior. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings.
TrapCommon trapIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
NextIf you missed it, review Relapse and side-effect mitigationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
CChoice CA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
DChoice DA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
Study tags
Relapse and side-effect mitigationMitigating relapse of target behaviorrelapseresurgence
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Selecting and Implementing Interventions and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.