Question

Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: applied scenario.

Assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should:

A
Keep a plan that works in sessions even though the people implementing it cannot do it reliably.
B
Remove supports abruptly once the graph improves for two sessions.
C
Use the most restrictive option first because it may produce the fastest visible change.
D
Teach a practical response that accesses the same outcome more efficiently than the target behavior.

Correct answer

Content quality status

machine gate passed
Orig
Original study item

This question was created for BCBA Scenario Tutor. It is not an official, leaked, or copied BACB exam question.

Chk
Automated validation passed

The item includes an answer key, explanation, wrong-choice notes, domain label, concept tags, and source notes. Automated checks cover structure, coverage, and consistency only. No named, credential-verifiable BCBA external review has occurred, and this is not a clinical or exam-validity certification.

Date
Last machine check: 2026-07-05

Source note: Original v2 item upgraded from internal task/concept map; not copied from official or commercial question banks.

Quick review facts

A concise review block for candidates and answer engines.

Fact
What this question tests

Socially valid alternative behavior selection: Functionally matched replacement behavior. in Selecting and Implementing Interventions, with study tags for Functionally matched replacement behavior, Socially valid alternative behavior selection, FCT, replacement response.

Fact
Best review move

Before reading the explanation, choose an answer and name the scenario clue. If you missed it, review Functionally matched replacement behavior and try similar questions in this domain.

Fact
Content boundary

This is an original study item for BCBA Scenario Tutor, not an official BACB exam question or a copied exam item.

Explanation

Answer D

The decision point is: Does the answer choose a feasible, least intrusive, function-based intervention and monitor implementation? This item specifically tests Socially valid alternative behavior selection through a applied-client-service-scenario format. The key clue is in the stem facts: Assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should: Answer D is strongest because it follows this rule: Teach a practical response that accesses the same outcome more efficiently than the target behavior. It fits the source-backed rule without announcing that rule in the stem. The tempting mistake is to choose a shortcut before the scenario's prerequisite is satisfied. This choice is weaker because it does not resolve the key prerequisite in the scenario: assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should: Exam move: name the missing prerequisite first, then eliminate answers that jump to a label, a familiar procedure, a single data point, or an undocumented action.

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, take a short diagnostic or drill this domain now. Diagnostic results can turn your misses into a focused next-study signal.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

Assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should:

Trap
Common trap

This choice is weaker because it does not resolve the key prerequisite in the scenario: assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should:

Next
If you missed it, review Functionally matched replacement behavior

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Exam-style review notes

Structured study guidance maintained by Bifang Studio's internal editors and automated quality checks.

v4-machine-content-gate
Rule
Socially valid alternative behavior selection: Functionally matched replacement behavior

Does the answer choose a feasible, least intrusive, function-based intervention and monitor implementation?

Clue
What the stem gives you

Assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should:

Trap
Common trap

Teach greeting for escape-maintained behavior. This often shows up as any good behavior can replace target behavior..

Fix
If you missed this item

Rewrite the miss as a rule: "When I see Functionally matched replacement behavior, I must identify the relevant evidence before choosing the action." Then answer two related H domain questions without reading explanations first.

Next
Next drill

Practice 3 more questions tagged to Functionally matched replacement behavior, then explain why each wrong answer is weaker before moving back to mixed practice.

Source-aware internal editorial maintenance using src-bacb-bcba-tco-6ed for study organization; not an official BACB item and not externally reviewed by a named, verifiable BCBA.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

This choice is weaker because it does not resolve the key prerequisite in the scenario: assessment data suggest a less intrusive plan may address calling out during independent work, but the team asks for a faster restrictive option. Across 5 sessions in service week 10, 2 observers recorded 56 minutes of observation in the elementary classroom. The BCBA should:

B
Choice B

This choice weakens the data basis for the decision. A defensible answer must check whether the measurement, observation, or visual-analysis evidence supports the next step.

C
Choice C

This choice moves too quickly toward a more intrusive response. The better answer checks function, risk, feasibility, and less intrusive options first.

Study tags

Functionally matched replacement behaviorSocially valid alternative behavior selectionFCTreplacement response

Related study guides

Try similar questions next

These are prioritized by shared domain, concept tags, difficulty, item type, and cognitive skill.

Broaden the same domain

Use these when you understood this item but want to test the same domain from a different skill angle.

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Selecting and Implementing Interventions. It also includes study tags for Functionally matched replacement behavior, Socially valid alternative behavior selection, FCT, replacement response.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.

Editorial transparency

Machine quality gate

Published by Bifang Studio. Content is maintained by internal editors with automated structure, coverage, and consistency checks. No content has been externally reviewed by a named, credential-verifiable BCBA; these checks do not certify clinical quality or exam validity.