Question

Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: applied scenario.

A plan for completing a multi-step job routine works in sessions but is difficult for job coach to use. Which decision best fits mitigating relapse of target behavior? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 3 settings.

A
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
B
Plan for relapse or side effects by monitoring context, thinning carefully, and adding safeguards in relation to adult client's stopping work after corrective feedback

Correct answer

C
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer B

The clue is the combination of duration data showing long pauses after feedback, stopping work after corrective feedback, and the required task: Mitigating relapse of target behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 3 settings. Plan for relapse or side effects by monitoring context, thinning carefully, and adding safeguards in relation to adult client's stopping work after corrective feedback is best because it answers that clue through relapse and side-effect mitigation instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of duration data showing long pauses after feedback, stopping work after corrective feedback, and the required task: Mitigating relapse of target behavior. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 3 settings.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Relapse and side-effect mitigation

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

C
Choice C

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Relapse and side-effect mitigationMitigating relapse of target behaviorrelapseresurgence

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Selecting and Implementing Interventions and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Selecting and Implementing Interventions. It also includes study tags for Relapse and side-effect mitigation, Mitigating relapse of target behavior, relapse, resurgence.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.