Question

Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: data interpretation.

A BCBA reviews ABC data from three outings for grabbing preferred items. The next decision depends on procedural-integrity measurement selection. What should the BCBA do? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

A
Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items

Correct answer

B
Send the written protocol again without observing performance
C
Proceed informally because the team believes the action will help
D
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month

Explanation

Answer A

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Procedural-integrity measurement selection. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting. Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through measurement quality and procedural integrity instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Procedural-integrity measurement selection. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

Next
If you missed it, review Internal validity and confounds

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

B
Choice B

Written directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.

C
Choice C

Good intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.

D
Choice D

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Study tags

Measurement quality and procedural integrityProcedural-integrity measurement selectionvalidityreliability

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Measurement, Data Display, and Interpretation and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Measurement, Data Display, and Interpretation. It also includes study tags for Measurement quality and procedural integrity, Procedural-integrity measurement selection, validity, reliability.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.