Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: data interpretation.
A BCBA reviews ABC data from three outings for grabbing preferred items. The next decision depends on procedural-integrity measurement selection. What should the BCBA do? The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.
ACheck measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred itemsCorrect answer
BTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
CTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
DBase the decision on the descriptive label for grabbing preferred items and bypass procedural-integrity measurement selection
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Procedural-integrity measurement selection. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings. Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through measurement quality and procedural integrity instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Procedural-integrity measurement selection. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
NextIf you missed it, review Internal validity and confoundsThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
CChoice CA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
DChoice DThis is weaker because the label does not answer the Procedural-integrity measurement selection decision point or test Measurement quality and procedural integrity.
Study tags
Measurement quality and procedural integrityProcedural-integrity measurement selectionvalidityreliability
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Measurement, Data Display, and Interpretation and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.