Question

Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: experimental design critique.

A BCBA is evaluating whether an intervention changed leaving the instructional area. A second program change began during the same week. Which concern best reflects internal and external validity? The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

A
Tell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
B
Treat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
C
Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area

Correct answer

D
Base the decision on the descriptive label for leaving the instructional area and bypass internal and external validity

Explanation

Answer C

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Internal and external validity. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting. Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area is best because it answers that clue through measurement quality and procedural integrity instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Internal and external validity. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

Next
If you missed it, review Internal validity and confounds

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Vague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.

B
Choice B

A single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.

D
Choice D

This is weaker because the label does not answer the Internal and external validity decision point or test Measurement quality and procedural integrity.

Study tags

Measurement quality and procedural integrityInternal and external validityvalidityreliability

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Experimental Design and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Experimental Design. It also includes study tags for Measurement quality and procedural integrity, Internal and external validity, validity, reliability.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.