Question
Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: experimental design critique.
The team wants stronger evidence before scaling a plan for using a clarification request. Which design decision best fits threats to internal validity? The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 1 setting.
ATell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
BTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
CBase the decision on the descriptive label for repeating questions after instructions and bypass threats to internal validity
DCheck measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to client's repeating questions after instructionsCorrect answer
Explanation
Answer DThe clue is the combination of parent report that conflicts with recent session data, repeating questions after instructions, and the required task: Threats to internal validity. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 1 setting. Check measurement quality, observer agreement, and procedural integrity before making a major decision in relation to client's repeating questions after instructions is best because it answers that clue through measurement quality and procedural integrity instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of parent report that conflicts with recent session data, repeating questions after instructions, and the required task: Threats to internal validity. The case file includes 11 recent sessions, 3 implementers, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
NextIf you missed it, review Internal validity and confoundsThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
BChoice BA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
CChoice CThis is weaker because the label does not answer the Threats to internal validity decision point or test Measurement quality and procedural integrity.
Study tags
Measurement quality and procedural integrityThreats to internal validityvalidityreliability
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Experimental Design and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.