Question

Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: applied scenario.

A plan for using a clarification request works in sessions but is difficult for caregiver to use. Which decision best fits mitigating unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishment? The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.

A
Continue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
B
Add a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
C
Use the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
D
Classify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to client's repeating questions after instructions

Correct answer

Explanation

Answer D

The clue is the combination of parent report that conflicts with recent session data, repeating questions after instructions, and the required task: Mitigating unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishment. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting. Classify the consequence by whether behavior increases or decreases and whether a stimulus is added or removed in relation to client's repeating questions after instructions is best because it answers that clue through reinforcement and punishment by behavior change instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.

Why this question is hard

Clue
Key scenario clue

The clue is the combination of parent report that conflicts with recent session data, repeating questions after instructions, and the required task: Mitigating unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishment. The case file includes 6 recent sessions, 2 implementers, and 1 setting.

Trap
Common trap

Ignoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.

Next
If you missed it, review Reinforcement and punishment by behavior change

Then answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.

Why the other choices are weaker

A
Choice A

Ignoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.

B
Choice B

A punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.

C
Choice C

A label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.

Study tags

Reinforcement and punishment by behavior changeMitigating unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishmentpositive reinforcementnegative reinforcement

Turn this into a study plan

If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Selecting and Implementing Interventions and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.

Related study guides

Try 5 similar questions

Question FAQ

What BCBA domain does this question cover?

This practice question is tagged to Selecting and Implementing Interventions. It also includes study tags for Reinforcement and punishment by behavior change, Mitigating unwanted effects of reinforcement, extinction, and punishment, positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement.

How should I review this practice question?

Answer the scenario before reading the explanation, compare your reasoning with the correct answer, then review why the distractors are weaker.

Is this an official BACB exam question?

No. This is an original study question for BCBA Scenario Tutor and is not an official BACB exam item.

Practice interactively

Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.