Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
In a clinic session, learner's leaving the instructional area changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches concurrent, multiple, mixed, and chained schedules? The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
ARely on caregiver's report alone and stop collecting direct evidence
BChange the intervention immediately based on the concern alone
CCompare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to learner's leaving the instructional areaCorrect answer
DContinue unchanged and ignore the new contextual information
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Concurrent, multiple, mixed, and chained schedules. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting. Compare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to learner's leaving the instructional area is best because it answers that clue through schedules, persistence, and response allocation instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of four sessions of stable baseline data followed by two overlapping intervention points, leaving the instructional area, and the required task: Concurrent, multiple, mixed, and chained schedules. The case file includes 4 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 1 setting.
TrapCommon trapStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
NextIf you missed it, review Schedules, persistence, and response allocationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AStakeholder input matters, but direct data, context, and integrity checks are still needed for a defensible answer.
BChoice BThis is weaker because it skips the assessment, integrity, or decision rule needed before changing procedures.
DChoice DIgnoring relevant data or context prevents a defensible behavior-analytic decision.
Study tags
Schedules, persistence, and response allocationConcurrent, multiple, mixed, and chained schedulesschedulesbehavioral momentum
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.