Question
Difficulty: hard. Skill: analyze. Type: concept discrimination.
During a community outing, the team explains adolescent's grabbing preferred items with a personality label. The BCBA wants the discussion to reflect science goals: description, prediction, and control. What is the best next step? The case file includes 12 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 4 settings.
ADefine the behavior in observable terms and assess relevant environmental variables before selecting intervention in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred itemsCorrect answer
BTreat the most recent data point as proof of the final conclusion
CBase the decision on the descriptive label for grabbing preferred items and bypass science goals: description, prediction, and control
DUse a familiar protocol even though it does not address observable behavior and environmental explanations
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Science goals: description, prediction, and control. The case file includes 12 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 4 settings. Define the behavior in observable terms and assess relevant environmental variables before selecting intervention in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through observable behavior and environmental explanations instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Science goals: description, prediction, and control. The case file includes 12 recent sessions, 4 implementers, and 4 settings.
TrapCommon trapA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
NextIf you missed it, review Observable behavior and environmental explanationsThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BA single point rarely supports a strong conclusion without considering trend, variability, and context.
CChoice CThis is weaker because the label does not answer the Science goals: description, prediction, and control decision point or test Observable behavior and environmental explanations.
DChoice DA familiar protocol is not enough unless it matches the assessed variables and the current decision question.
Study tags
Observable behavior and environmental explanationsScience goals: description, prediction, and controlmentalismoperational explanations
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.