Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
During a home program, the team explains child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented with a personality label. The BCBA wants the discussion to reflect science goals: description, prediction, and control. What is the best next step? The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 4 settings.
ADefine the behavior in observable terms and assess relevant environmental variables before selecting intervention in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presentedCorrect answer
BSend the written protocol again without observing performance
CProceed informally because the team believes the action will help
DTell everyone to try harder and review the case next month
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Science goals: description, prediction, and control. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 4 settings. Define the behavior in observable terms and assess relevant environmental variables before selecting intervention in relation to child's dropping to the floor when demands are presented is best because it answers that clue through observable behavior and environmental explanations instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of caregiver notes plus one direct observation, dropping to the floor when demands are presented, and the required task: Science goals: description, prediction, and control. The case file includes 9 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 4 settings.
TrapCommon trapWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
NextIf you missed it, review Observable behavior and environmental explanationsThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
CChoice CGood intent does not replace consent, documentation, competence, or other safeguards.
DChoice DVague delayed feedback does not create a measurable plan for improvement.
Study tags
Observable behavior and environmental explanationsScience goals: description, prediction, and controlmentalismoperational explanations
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behaviorism and Philosophical Foundations and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.