Question
Difficulty: easy. Skill: recognize. Type: applied scenario.
Adolescent is learning waiting for access, but performance changes depending on prompts and consequences. Which procedure best fits time-based reinforcement schedules? The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.
ACompare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to adolescent's waiting for accessCorrect answer
BAdd a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
CUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
DSend the written protocol again without observing performance
Explanation
Answer AThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Time-based reinforcement schedules. The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings. Compare the schedule or relative reinforcement conditions before predicting persistence or allocation in relation to adolescent's waiting for access is best because it answers that clue through schedules, persistence, and response allocation instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Time-based reinforcement schedules. The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 1 implementer, and 2 settings.
TrapCommon trapA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
NextIf you missed it, review Schedules, persistence, and response allocationThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
BChoice BA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
CChoice CA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
DChoice DWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
Study tags
Schedules, persistence, and response allocationTime-based reinforcement schedulesschedulesbehavioral momentum
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Behavior-Change Procedures and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.