Question
Difficulty: medium. Skill: apply. Type: concept discrimination.
In a community outing, adolescent's grabbing preferred items changes after a specific antecedent and consequence arrangement. Which analysis best matches stimulus and stimulus class? The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings.
AAdd a punishment procedure before clarifying function, risk, or feasibility
BUse the descriptive label as the explanation and treatment target
CAnalyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred itemsCorrect answer
DSend the written protocol again without observing performance
Explanation
Answer CThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Stimulus and stimulus class. The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings. Analyze the antecedent conditions and whether responding occurs across trained and untrained stimuli in relation to adolescent's grabbing preferred items is best because it answers that clue through stimulus control, discrimination, and generalization instead of treating the scenario as a generic behavior problem. On exam items like this, name the decision point first, then eliminate options that rely on one report, a label, a familiar protocol, or an action that skips the relevant data check.
Why this question is hard
ClueKey scenario clueThe clue is the combination of ABC data from three outings, grabbing preferred items, and the required task: Stimulus and stimulus class. The case file includes 7 recent sessions, 5 implementers, and 4 settings.
TrapCommon trapA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
NextIf you missed it, review Motivating operations versus discriminative stimuliThen answer a few related scenarios before moving back to broad practice.
Why the other choices are weaker
AChoice AA punishment-first response is weaker when less intrusive, function-based, or assessment steps have not been addressed.
BChoice BA label is not enough; the decision should be based on observable behavior and relevant variables.
DChoice DWritten directions alone do not verify performance or correct implementation errors.
Study tags
Stimulus control, discrimination, and generalizationStimulus and stimulus classstimulus controldiscrimination
Related concept pages
Turn this into a study plan
If this question felt difficult, practice a short drill from Concepts and Principles and use the review page to turn missed items into a weak-area plan.
Practice interactively
Try more BCBA scenario questions in the interactive practice mode, then use review tools to track missed domains and flagged items.